On Monday June 8th we met for our fourth class to study the book Tactics, written by Greg Koukl.
Since we've been off for a month we spent a good amount of time just catching up. Terrence shared about his evangelism trip to Ocean City with Eric Dressel. He spent two days sharing the gospel with high school and college kids out there for senior week.Terrence developed a short 6-question survey to gather data and start the conversation. He found that it was helpful in getting more people engaged but a lower percentage of those who took the survey wanted to continue on in conversation.
The questions on his survey were on the topic of Christianity and consisted on things like "were you raised in a Christian home?", "is Christianity a good, bad, or neutral thing for society?", "Who is Jesus?", and "How does a person become a Christian?". The biggest "miss" was on that last question in which people often answered by saying "go to church to become a Christian." Though church is obviously important many unfortunately forgot the fundamental concepts of faith and repentance. Overall though, Terrence reported good things and had a great time being out there.
Next we spent our remaining time watching the video lesson on the "Suicide Tactic". The Suicide Tactic is the action of identifying a self-destructing statement and watching it kill itself. An example of such a statement would be "I can't type a word in English" or Yogi Berra's advice, "Always go to other people's funerals, otherwise they won't come to yours." The statements are internally contradictory in that they can't be both true and not true. It can't be that I "can't type a word in English" and that the statement itself entails that I've typed words in English!
We ended our time reviewing some discussion questions in the middle of the lesson on identifying the suicidal aspects of statements like "It's wrong for missionaries to try to change other people's religious reviews", "All religions are equally true and valid", and "Truth is only gained through science."
Showing posts with label Tactics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tactics. Show all posts
Monday, June 22, 2015
Friday, April 17, 2015
"Perfecting the Columbo Tactic" (Class 3 recap)
On Monday April 13th we met for our third class to study the book Tactics, written by Greg Koukl.
We started off the class with a short quiz on the topic of "Who was Jesus?" as a review of the On Guard material. Terrence went over the answers to our quiz from last time on the topic of morality and handed back our grades. Remember, each person's quiz grades will be summed from week to week to and there's a rumor that a prize will be given out to the person with the highest overall score at the end of the course! So keep studying. The quiz for next time will either be on Suffering (On Guard chapter 7) or Did Jesus Rise from the Dead? (On Guard chapter 8).
Next we reviewed the lessons from our first session of the Tactics course and then started the new material from this second session. The topic this week was about "Perfecting the Columbo Tactic: Exposing a Weakness of a Flaw".
This third step in the Columbo tactic involves careful listening, insight, and practice. It requires us to see the flaws in others' arguments and lovingly expose it.
No one likes to hear that they are wrong. So to soften the blow when exposing a weakness, use an indirect approach by starting with things like, "I'm just curious...", "Maybe you can clear this up for me...", or "Something about this bothers me...". Additionally, ask for permission to share an alternative way of thinking or asking if they think an alternative would work better to help ease into your challenge.
An example of this third step that we discussed was a response to the hypothetical challenge: "you shouldn't push your morality one me!" The flaw is that this challenge indicts itself. It is telling me what I ought to do (morality) which is the very thing it is saying not to do! So we want to help to other person see that contradiction. We could respond by asking if the person is making a moral claim in telling us what not to do in order to gently expose the flaw.
Finally we discussed what to do if someone uses the Columbo tactic on you. What if you are in the hot seat? First, stop the advance. Then regain control. And if all else fails just ask if you can think it over for a while and get back to the other person.
The presentation from Monday is available digitally on the website here.
Next time we will meet on April 27th, same time, same place (starting at 6:45pm with coffee, desserts, and fellowship). Hope to see you there!
We started off the class with a short quiz on the topic of "Who was Jesus?" as a review of the On Guard material. Terrence went over the answers to our quiz from last time on the topic of morality and handed back our grades. Remember, each person's quiz grades will be summed from week to week to and there's a rumor that a prize will be given out to the person with the highest overall score at the end of the course! So keep studying. The quiz for next time will either be on Suffering (On Guard chapter 7) or Did Jesus Rise from the Dead? (On Guard chapter 8).
Next we reviewed the lessons from our first session of the Tactics course and then started the new material from this second session. The topic this week was about "Perfecting the Columbo Tactic: Exposing a Weakness of a Flaw".
This third step in the Columbo tactic involves careful listening, insight, and practice. It requires us to see the flaws in others' arguments and lovingly expose it.
No one likes to hear that they are wrong. So to soften the blow when exposing a weakness, use an indirect approach by starting with things like, "I'm just curious...", "Maybe you can clear this up for me...", or "Something about this bothers me...". Additionally, ask for permission to share an alternative way of thinking or asking if they think an alternative would work better to help ease into your challenge.
An example of this third step that we discussed was a response to the hypothetical challenge: "you shouldn't push your morality one me!" The flaw is that this challenge indicts itself. It is telling me what I ought to do (morality) which is the very thing it is saying not to do! So we want to help to other person see that contradiction. We could respond by asking if the person is making a moral claim in telling us what not to do in order to gently expose the flaw.
Finally we discussed what to do if someone uses the Columbo tactic on you. What if you are in the hot seat? First, stop the advance. Then regain control. And if all else fails just ask if you can think it over for a while and get back to the other person.
The presentation from Monday is available digitally on the website here.
Next time we will meet on April 27th, same time, same place (starting at 6:45pm with coffee, desserts, and fellowship). Hope to see you there!
Friday, March 27, 2015
"Refining the Columbo Tactic" (Class 2 recap)
On Monday March 23rd we met for our second class to study the book Tactics, written by Greg Koukl.
We started off the class with a short quiz on the topic of God and morality as a review of the On Guard material.
Terrence went over the answers to our quiz from last time and handed back our grades. His wife graciously graded the quizzes based on what she thought were good responses. Everyone was given a secret moniker so that grades could be posted by our code names (the names were based on Transformer names!). Terrence will sum each person's quiz grades from week to week to and post the standings to help foster a little healthy competition. There's a rumor that a prize will be given out to the person with the highest overall score at the end of the course! So keep studying.
The quiz for next time will either be on Suffering (On Guard chapter 7) or Who Was Jesus? (On Guard chapter 8).
Next we reviewed the lessons from our first session of the Tactics course and then started the new material from this second session. The topic this week was about"Refining the Columbo Tactic: Reversing the Burden of Proof."
{The burden of proof is on the person making the claim to give reasons or evidence to back it up.}
In practice this can take the form of a simple question like, "How did you come to that conclusion?" or "Why do you say that?" or "What are your reasons for thinking that?".
The first Columbo tactic was all about finding out what someone believes. The second is about why they believe it.
Asking for reasons might leave the other person with a blank stare because frankly they might not have thought through why they believe what they do. They may not have really reached a conclusion. It's a good way to call out those fanciful stories that others may throw out as explanations. Remember, "an alternate explanation is not a refutation."
For example, Greg Koukl related a story of a person "refuting" intelligent design by offering an alternate explanation along the lines of "there was a point in the nothing and then it caused ripples that eventually spun out galaxies and stars and planets." That might be an alternate explanation but it's on the person making the claim to back it up to show that it is more than just a "once upon a time..." story.
This class wrapped up a few minutes short of finishing the second session. So we'll finish that up next time. Until then here's some homework: First, practice the Columbo tactics. Second, review the material from this class. Third, read ahead in the next session (page 42 to 59 in the Student Manual). Fourthly, review the topic of suffering and "Who was Jesus?" for a quiz on either one next time.
Overall it was a great class with a lot of really important practical tips and good discussion.
The presentation from Monday is available digitally on the website here.
Next time we will meet on April 13th, same time, same place (starting at 6:45pm with coffee, desserts, and fellowship). We'll learn about "Perfecting the Columbo Tactic". Hope to see you there!
We started off the class with a short quiz on the topic of God and morality as a review of the On Guard material.
Terrence went over the answers to our quiz from last time and handed back our grades. His wife graciously graded the quizzes based on what she thought were good responses. Everyone was given a secret moniker so that grades could be posted by our code names (the names were based on Transformer names!). Terrence will sum each person's quiz grades from week to week to and post the standings to help foster a little healthy competition. There's a rumor that a prize will be given out to the person with the highest overall score at the end of the course! So keep studying.
The quiz for next time will either be on Suffering (On Guard chapter 7) or Who Was Jesus? (On Guard chapter 8).
Next we reviewed the lessons from our first session of the Tactics course and then started the new material from this second session. The topic this week was about"Refining the Columbo Tactic: Reversing the Burden of Proof."
{The burden of proof is on the person making the claim to give reasons or evidence to back it up.}
In practice this can take the form of a simple question like, "How did you come to that conclusion?" or "Why do you say that?" or "What are your reasons for thinking that?".
The first Columbo tactic was all about finding out what someone believes. The second is about why they believe it.
Asking for reasons might leave the other person with a blank stare because frankly they might not have thought through why they believe what they do. They may not have really reached a conclusion. It's a good way to call out those fanciful stories that others may throw out as explanations. Remember, "an alternate explanation is not a refutation."
For example, Greg Koukl related a story of a person "refuting" intelligent design by offering an alternate explanation along the lines of "there was a point in the nothing and then it caused ripples that eventually spun out galaxies and stars and planets." That might be an alternate explanation but it's on the person making the claim to back it up to show that it is more than just a "once upon a time..." story.
This class wrapped up a few minutes short of finishing the second session. So we'll finish that up next time. Until then here's some homework: First, practice the Columbo tactics. Second, review the material from this class. Third, read ahead in the next session (page 42 to 59 in the Student Manual). Fourthly, review the topic of suffering and "Who was Jesus?" for a quiz on either one next time.
Overall it was a great class with a lot of really important practical tips and good discussion.
The presentation from Monday is available digitally on the website here.
Next time we will meet on April 13th, same time, same place (starting at 6:45pm with coffee, desserts, and fellowship). We'll learn about "Perfecting the Columbo Tactic". Hope to see you there!
Thursday, March 19, 2015
"Refining the Columbo Tactic" on Monday March 23rd
|
|
Friday, March 13, 2015
"Learning the Columbo Tactic" (Class 1 recap)
|
|
Thursday, February 26, 2015
"Tactics" Pre-start Class Recap
So some good and bad news about our attempt to start our new study of the bookTactics, written by Greg Koukl. The bad news is that we only had three of us in attendance so we decided to delay the start of the study to our next meeting on March 9th. But having only three of us turned out great because we were able to have some really great conversations about how to share your faith.
Our own Terrence Johnson will be leading this next study of Tactics related to conversing with others about our faith. Terrence is a veteran in this area so Donna and I took the opportunity to ask him for advice on how to start religious conversations with people. Religion doesn't normally come up in conversations so how do you bring it up? Terrence offered us his experience to tell us about his old and current method. His old method was to just dive in, insert a religious topic into a conversation and feel out his opportunity to delve deeper to share the gospel. But he said he's received feedback that that method seems disingenuous because it seems like deceptive proselytizing. Instead Terrence has used a current, more effect way of initiating religious conversations to simply ask the person if they'd mind talking about religion for 5 minutes and then they can leave it alone after that if they want. That way is more upfront and also gives the other person a moment to prepare themselves. and to hear about his experiences. It was very encouraging and empowering to hear Terrence discuss his experiences of having religious conversations with friends, family, or even strangers!
Terrence then discussed some opportunities to go out and share our faith in the local community. He'll talk more about them during the next class but briefly they include opportunities to share the gospel in Ocean City, Havre de Grace, the Inner Harbor, Baltimore's Lexington Market, and more. All of which entail going out with a group to talk with folks about your faith.
So our next meeting will be on March 9th starting at 6:45pm to 8:30pm when we will start the study of Tactics: A Game Plan for Discussing Your Christian Convictions. Hope to see you then!
Our own Terrence Johnson will be leading this next study of Tactics related to conversing with others about our faith. Terrence is a veteran in this area so Donna and I took the opportunity to ask him for advice on how to start religious conversations with people. Religion doesn't normally come up in conversations so how do you bring it up? Terrence offered us his experience to tell us about his old and current method. His old method was to just dive in, insert a religious topic into a conversation and feel out his opportunity to delve deeper to share the gospel. But he said he's received feedback that that method seems disingenuous because it seems like deceptive proselytizing. Instead Terrence has used a current, more effect way of initiating religious conversations to simply ask the person if they'd mind talking about religion for 5 minutes and then they can leave it alone after that if they want. That way is more upfront and also gives the other person a moment to prepare themselves. and to hear about his experiences. It was very encouraging and empowering to hear Terrence discuss his experiences of having religious conversations with friends, family, or even strangers!
Terrence then discussed some opportunities to go out and share our faith in the local community. He'll talk more about them during the next class but briefly they include opportunities to share the gospel in Ocean City, Havre de Grace, the Inner Harbor, Baltimore's Lexington Market, and more. All of which entail going out with a group to talk with folks about your faith.
So our next meeting will be on March 9th starting at 6:45pm to 8:30pm when we will start the study of Tactics: A Game Plan for Discussing Your Christian Convictions. Hope to see you then!
Thursday, February 19, 2015
"Tactics" details
| |||
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



